![]() ![]() You should just try WSJ out for yourself though (and I'd recommend trying FT as well). Faculty and staff may also take advantage of this subscription. On the whole I like FT more, and I think they regularly run promo deals as well. then everyone piled in and oh boy did CTAs shit the bed very recently. Of course all of the alpha is entirely outside of these walls, and if anything the only alpha in shiny object space is being contrarian (for example WSJ was probably running articles on CTA/trend following for months after they got outsized returns. I call it "monkey likes shiny object" syndrome where most people just obsess about the same few shiny topics/narratives and then move to new ones every couple of months. WSJ is like the well pedigreed professional who is undeniably an expert in finance, but does things like just adding more NVDA into the portfolio at a 700B market cap because they "want AI exposure". Or it could be "traders expect Fed to cut" but I think that simplified thinking just ends up hurting participants wanting to think more deeply about what actually moves markets. For example WSJ will be talking about the recent mega-vol in the 2yr space as Fed expectation linked, but there are other important angles like the recent JGB trading fiasco leading Japanese entities to (temporarily?) shunt massive amounts of money into US fixed income, which further kicked off a chain reaction of global macro fund pain that lead to major blowups and forced position exits. If you have room for more mainstream narrative content then it's worth adding, but I find that too much content from these sources can be a bit blinding and draw you into the herd a bit too much. Get that crap off of my finance feed entirely. I make a serious effort to entirely cut out CNBC/etc style news from my life (it literally greatly improves my trading) and seeing some of the NewsCorp political crap makes me occasionally want to drop the subscription. Waste of time.Īnd then some of the opinion pieces are awful mainstream media style drivel, for example someone dropped a self-righteous turd of an article about gender/trans categorization on Easter. And let's be honest, the only reason the article is even there is because someone has been hearing about ChatGPT. I know for a fact that this is a successful tool used in sophisticated finance and they basically just glossed over everything and then ended the article. Ex I just finished spending 3 minutes reading an article about lackluster AI performance in investing. You can activate your WSJ account with five easy steps: Activate your Brown University Library-sponsored Journal membership at the. Most of the other stuff is a waste of time for professional level investing/trading. In US presidential elections/big political events the coverage is great as well. You should be able to read a full article after clearing the above steps.The analysis on US data releases and Fed related topics is quite good. Click on the Library WSJ.com access link again, and then click on "Already Have An Account - Sign In" and sign in with your credentials.ģ. At the login screen, click on your email address (i.e. If you are having problems accessing a full article as a returning user, please follow these steps below to resolve the issue -ġ. ![]() After 3 days, simply come back and click here again and login as an existing user with the same username and password you originally created. Your access will be available for the next 3 days. Click here to create your account and you can start using WSJ.com immediately. Home access is available to Concord residents only. Spotify hosted performers including Florence and the Machine last month in Cannes, France. In-Library access is available to all users and visitors. The Concord Free Public Library is pleased to offer free and unlimited access to The Wall Street Journal digital content both in the Library and remotely. Concord Stories from Special CollectionsĪccess The Wall Street Journal From Anywhere. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |